Body Tube Metric Conversion Guide
Understanding Model Rocket Body Tube Sizing
Model rocket body tubes use a historical designation system (BT-5, BT-20, BT-50, etc.) that can be confusing for builders working in metric units. This comprehensive guide provides exact metric equivalents for all standard body tube sizes, helping international rocketeers and 3D printing enthusiasts work with precise measurements.


The BT Numbering System
The BT (Body Tube) numbering system originated with Estes Industries in the 1960s. The numbers don’t directly correspond to dimensions—they’re simply sequential designations. This creates confusion when trying to determine actual sizes or convert to metric measurements.
Key facts:
- BT numbers are arbitrary designations, not measurements
- Most tubes are based on imperial (inch) dimensions
- Metric equivalents are calculated conversions, not original specifications
- Wall thickness varies between tube sizes
Complete BT to Metric Conversion Table
Small Diameter Tubes (Under 30mm)
| BT Size | Inner Diameter (inches) | Inner Diameter (mm) | Outer Diameter (inches) | Outer Diameter (mm) | Wall Thickness (inches) | Wall Thickness (mm) | Common Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-3 | 0.349″ | 8.86 mm | 0.375″ | 9.53 mm | 0.013″ | 0.33 mm | Micro rockets |
| BT-5 | 0.515″ | 13.08 mm | 0.541″ | 13.74 mm | 0.013″ | 0.33 mm | Mini engines |
| BT-20 | 0.710″ | 18.03 mm | 0.736″ | 18.69 mm | 0.013″ | 0.33 mm | 18mm engines |
| BT-30 | 0.725″ | 18.42 mm | 0.765″ | 19.43 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | Specialty |
| BT-40 | 0.765″ | 19.43 mm | 0.821″ | 20.85 mm | 0.023″ | 0.58 mm | Specialty |
| BT-48 | 0.902″ | 22.91 mm | 0.928″ | 23.57 mm | 0.013″ | 0.33 mm | Specialty |
Medium Diameter Tubes (30-60mm)
| BT Size | Inner Diameter (inches) | Inner Diameter (mm) | Outer Diameter (inches) | Outer Diameter (mm) | Wall Thickness (inches) | Wall Thickness (mm) | Common Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-50 | 0.950″ | 24.13 mm | 0.976″ | 24.79 mm | 0.013″ | 0.33 mm | 24mm engines |
| BT-51 | 0.984″ | 24.99 mm | 1.011″ | 25.68 mm | 0.013″ | 0.33 mm | Specialty |
| BT-52 | 0.988″ | 25.10 mm | 1.114″ | 28.30 mm | 0.063″ | 1.60 mm | Heavy wall |
| BT-55 | 1.283″ | 32.59 mm | 1.325″ | 33.66 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | 29mm engines |
| BT-56 | 1.304″ | 33.12 mm | 1.346″ | 34.19 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | Specialty |
| BT-58 | 1.498″ | 38.05 mm | 1.540″ | 39.12 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | 38mm engines |
| BT-60 | 1.595″ | 40.51 mm | 1.637″ | 41.58 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | Standard |
| BT-63 | 1.639″ | 41.63 mm | 1.681″ | 42.70 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | Specialty |
Large Diameter Tubes (60-100mm)
| BT Size | Inner Diameter (inches) | Inner Diameter (mm) | Outer Diameter (inches) | Outer Diameter (mm) | Wall Thickness (inches) | Wall Thickness (mm) | Common Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT-67 | 2.000″ | 50.80 mm | 2.040″ | 51.82 mm | 0.020″ | 0.51 mm | 2-inch tubes |
| BT-70 | 2.175″ | 55.25 mm | 2.217″ | 56.31 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | Standard large |
| BT-80 | 2.560″ | 65.02 mm | 2.600″ | 66.04 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | Standard large |
| BT-99 | 3.668″ | 93.17 mm | 3.790″ | 96.27 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | 4-inch tubes |
| BT-100 | 3.702″ | 94.31 mm | 3.744″ | 95.10 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | Specialty |
| BT-101 | 3.896″ | 98.96 mm | 3.938″ | 100.03 mm | 0.021″ | 0.53 mm | 4-inch tubes |
Most Common BT Sizes and Metric Equivalents
For practical rocketry, these are the most frequently used sizes:
BT-5 (13mm)
- Metric equivalent: 13mm inner, 13.7mm outer
- Use: Mini engines (13mm motors)
- Common rockets: Micro Maxx, Mini Maxx
BT-20 (18mm)
- Metric equivalent: 18mm inner, 18.7mm outer
- Use: Standard 18mm engines (A-C motors)
- Common rockets: Alpha, Wizard, Big Bertha
BT-50 (24mm)
- Metric equivalent: 24mm inner, 24.8mm outer
- Use: Standard 24mm engines (D-G motors)
- Common rockets: Mean Machine, Nike Smoke
BT-55 (33mm)
- Metric equivalent: 33mm inner, 33.7mm outer
- Use: 29mm engines, payload sections
- Common rockets: Mercury Redstone, Saturn V
BT-60 (41mm)
- Metric equivalent: 41mm inner, 41.6mm outer
- Use: Large model rockets, clusters
- Common rockets: Big Bertha (large), Patriot
BT-70 (56mm)
- Metric equivalent: 56mm inner, 56.3mm outer
- Use: Mid-power rockets, 38mm engines
- Common rockets: LOC IV, various mid-power
BT-80 (66mm)
- Metric equivalent: 66mm inner, 66mm outer
- Use: High-power rockets, 54mm engines
- Common rockets: LOC V, various HPR
Metric Tube Standards
Some manufacturers produce tubes in true metric sizes, particularly for international markets and 3D printing applications.
Common Metric Sizes
| Metric Size | Inner Diameter | Outer Diameter | BT Equivalent | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13mm | 13.0mm | 14.0mm | BT-5 | Mini rockets |
| 18mm | 18.0mm | 19.0mm | BT-20 | Standard small |
| 24mm | 24.0mm | 25.0mm | BT-50 | Standard medium |
| 29mm | 29.0mm | 30.0mm | Near BT-55 | Standard mid |
| 38mm | 38.0mm | 39.0mm | BT-58 | Mid-power |
| 54mm | 54.0mm | 55.0mm | Near BT-70 | High-power |
| 75mm | 75.0mm | 76.0mm | Near BT-80 | Large HPR |
| 98mm | 98.0mm | 99.0mm | BT-101 | Very large HPR |
3D Printing Considerations
When designing 3D printed rocket components, metric dimensions are often easier to work with than imperial BT sizes.
Design Recommendations
For body tubes:
- Use true metric sizes (18mm, 24mm, 29mm) for easier design
- Account for printer tolerance (±0.2mm typical)
- Design couplers with 0.2-0.3mm clearance
For motor mounts:
- Use exact motor dimensions (18mm, 24mm, 29mm, 38mm, 54mm)
- Add 0.3-0.5mm clearance for motor insertion
- Consider heat resistance near motor
For nose cones:
- Match outer diameter to body tube outer diameter
- Add 0.2-0.3mm clearance for shoulder fit
- Consider wall thickness (1.5-2.0mm typical)
Tolerance Stack-Up
When mixing BT-sized components with metric 3D printed parts:
| Component | Tolerance | Fit Type |
|---|---|---|
| BT-50 tube | ±0.1mm | Standard |
| 3D printed coupler | ±0.2mm | Snug fit |
| 3D printed nose cone | ±0.2mm | Slip fit |
| 3D printed fin can | ±0.3mm | Press fit |
Recommendation: Design for slip fits (0.2-0.3mm clearance) rather than press fits to accommodate tolerance variations.
International Sizing
European Standards
European rocketry often uses true metric sizing:
- 18mm: Equivalent to BT-20
- 24mm: Equivalent to BT-50
- 29mm: Between BT-55 and BT-58
- 38mm: Equivalent to BT-58
- 54mm: Between BT-70 and BT-80
Asian Standards
Asian manufacturers typically follow metric standards:
- 13mm: Mini rockets
- 18mm: Standard small
- 24mm: Standard medium
- 30mm: Mid-power
- 40mm: Large models
Conversion Formulas
Inches to Millimeters
Formula: mm = inches × 25.4
Examples:
- 0.976″ × 25.4 = 24.79mm (BT-50 outer)
- 1.637″ × 25.4 = 41.58mm (BT-60 outer)
- 2.217″ × 25.4 = 56.31mm (BT-70 outer)
Millimeters to Inches
Formula: inches = mm ÷ 25.4
Examples:
- 24mm ÷ 25.4 = 0.945″ (near BT-50)
- 29mm ÷ 25.4 = 1.142″ (between BT-55 and BT-58)
- 54mm ÷ 25.4 = 2.126″ (near BT-70)
Wall Thickness Standards
Standard Wall Thicknesses
| Thickness (inches) | Thickness (mm) | Application |
|---|---|---|
| 0.013″ | 0.33mm | Light duty, small rockets |
| 0.020″ | 0.51mm | Standard duty |
| 0.021″ | 0.53mm | Standard duty (most common) |
| 0.023″ | 0.58mm | Heavy duty |
| 0.030″ | 0.76mm | Heavy duty, specialty |
| 0.063″ | 1.60mm | Extra heavy, reinforced |
Wall Thickness Selection Guide
For low-power rockets (A-D motors):
- Use 0.013″ (0.33mm) for weight savings
- Adequate for typical flight loads
For mid-power rockets (E-G motors):
- Use 0.021″ (0.53mm) standard wall
- Good balance of strength and weight
For high-power rockets (H+ motors):
- Use 0.030″ (0.76mm) or thicker
- Consider reinforced or composite materials
Practical Applications
Substituting Metric Tubes for BT Sizes
When exact BT sizes aren’t available, metric tubes can substitute:
| BT Size | Metric Substitute | Fit Quality | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| BT-20 | 18mm metric | Excellent | Nearly identical |
| BT-50 | 24mm metric | Good | Slightly smaller |
| BT-55 | 29mm metric | Fair | Smaller, may need adapter |
| BT-60 | 40mm metric | Good | Slightly smaller |
| BT-70 | 54mm metric | Fair | Smaller, different motor mount |
Motor Mount Compatibility
| Motor Size | BT Size | Metric Equivalent | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13mm | BT-5 | 13mm | Direct fit |
| 18mm | BT-20 | 18mm | Direct fit |
| 24mm | BT-50 | 24mm | Direct fit |
| 29mm | BT-55/58 | 29mm | Use 29mm metric tube |
| 38mm | BT-58 | 38mm | Direct fit |
| 54mm | BT-70/80 | 54mm | Use 54mm metric tube |
Measurement Tools
Calipers
Digital calipers provide the most accurate measurements:
- Resolution: 0.01mm or 0.001″
- Accuracy: ±0.02mm typical
- Measure both inner and outer diameters
Tube Gauges
Specialized tube gauges quickly identify BT sizes:
- Insert tube into gauge
- Read BT size directly
- Less accurate than calipers but faster
3D Printed Test Fits
Print test rings to verify fit:
- Design rings at various diameters
- Test fit with actual components
- Adjust CAD models based on results
Common Conversions for Quick Reference
Small Tubes
- BT-5 = 13mm
- BT-20 = 18mm
- BT-50 = 24mm
Medium Tubes
- BT-55 = 33mm
- BT-58 = 38mm
- BT-60 = 41mm
Large Tubes
- BT-70 = 56mm
- BT-80 = 66mm
- BT-101 = 98mm
Conclusion
Understanding metric equivalents for BT-sized tubes is essential for international rocketeers, 3D printing enthusiasts, and anyone working with metric measurement systems. While BT sizes are historical designations, the metric conversions are straightforward and allow for precise component design and sourcing.
Key points:
- BT numbers are arbitrary, not measurements
- Most common sizes: BT-20 (18mm), BT-50 (24mm), BT-60 (41mm)
- Metric tubes are often easier for 3D printing
- Account for tolerances when mixing systems
- Use calipers for accurate measurements
For 3D printing applications, true metric sizes (18mm, 24mm, 29mm, 38mm, 54mm) are often more practical than exact BT equivalents.
Quick Reference Card:
Related Guides
Resources
- BT-5: 13mm
- BT-20: 18mm
- BT-50: 24mm
- BT-55: 33mm
- BT-60: 41mm
- BT-70: 56mm
- BT-80: 66mm
Pillar: This article is part of the Body Tubes topic hub. See all articles in this section for related comparisons and guides.

One Comment